|
Sr. |
What HP QTP has |
What Selenium has |
|
1 |
QTP is ideally suited for browser based testing |
Selenium too can very well do browser based testing |
|
2 |
QTP is licensed software & requires license costs that are quite a
bit. |
Selenium is an open source tool that doesn’t cost anything |
|
3 |
QTP is quite easy to use. It is quite easy to edit the script,
parameterize, navigate, playback & validate the results. |
For using Selenium one needs to have programming skills. |
|
4 |
QTP is quite easy to learn in a short time. |
Selenium needs quite a bit of expertise compared to QTP. |
|
5 |
QTP offers great benefit of the support for Business Process Testing. |
Selenium users don’t enjoy such benefits |
|
6 |
QTP comes powered with several add-ins by which user can comfortably
work with Web, Windows, Java, dotNet applications simultaneously. |
Selenium users don’t enjoy such facility. |
|
7 |
QTP seamlessly integrates with QC and has excellent ability to
automate non-web applications. |
Selenium is an excellent tool for purely web-based applications,
especially when you don’t need QC. |
|
8 |
QTP works very well with database applications better than Selenium. |
With Selenium one needs to exert hard to do the same job. |
|
9 |
It is difficult to deploy smoke tests for web applications using QTP
especially with Windows7. |
With Selenium these tasks can be easily accomplished. |
|
10 |
QTP uses VBscript as the only scripting language |
Selenium provides a test domain specific language (DSL) to write tests
in many popular programming languages, in addition to scripting with VB
script |
|
11 |
QTP users find scripts written in VBscript more flexible & easy to
manipulate & as such tool tends to be cost effective due to the
availability of a full fledged support. |
Selenium users feel that the tool tends to be expensive due to lack of
support & necessity of rewriting its scripts quite often |
|
12 |
Resource wise it is quite easy to find engineers having expertise on
QTP |
Selenium Automation Engineer are bit scarce. |
|
13 |
With QTP we can easily generate most comprehensive reports due to the availability
of an efficient online help |
Selenium users don’t enjoy such luxury as enjoyed by QTP users |
|
14 |
Using a QTP framework needs less skills & everyone from a beginner
to an expert can contribute in test creation to maintenance |
Skill level expected in a Selenium Automation Engineer are a bit
higher compared to QTP Automation Engineer |
|
15 |
QTP users don’t enjoy a freedom of scripting language & IDE like
their counterparts using Selenium. |
For web based applications, development with Selenium is a wonderful
experience since developer gets two benefits like; 1) Scripting language of own choice 2) IDE of Own choice. |
|
16 |
QTP is one of the best automation testing tools due to its unique features
like Object Repositories, Object identification, Smart Identification etc in
addition to its unmatched strength in database testing. |
Selenium certainly lacks such features packed in QTP. |
Conclusion:
Our objective had not been to favor one at the cost of the second. It is a matter of convenience for the testers & programmers to select a tool that suits their requirements best.
Lastly both these tools have their own advantages & shortcomings, while it all depends upon the users who truly know how to exploit them to their best advantage.
Source: http://www.softwaretestinggenius.com
Comments